The bad news is that squash did not make it into the 2016 Olympics. Making it in would have meant a massive injection of funds into elite player development – and therefore into the sport science interventions and research behind such development. Specifically, it would have meant more funding for squash-specific research of all kinds: physiology, biomechanics, notational analysis, sports medicine, and sport psychology. Currently, in terms of the number of scientific publications, squash lags well behind its sister sports of tennis, table tennis and badminton.
The at least not catastrophic news, is that there will still be a continuing significant need for squash sport scientists to interpret and apply general and racquet-sport specific research to assist the squash coach to develop their players. I regularly monitor the major sport science journals for those findings that can be applied to squash. This requires not only a pretty good knowledge of the different sport science disciplines, but also a good knowledge of the sport in which the research was conducted.
I have been lucky enough to have been a sport science consultant with three different Canadian National Team Programs (Squash, Tennis, Racquetball), each of which has won (or had) at least one world championship or Olympic Gold Medal during the period I worked with the program. It would have been very exciting to have made it into the Olympics, but at the end of the day, it really is not going to affect the search for excellence by squash coaches and their players.